Data Science Experience
The goal of this assignment is not just to observe data science—but to begin participating in the data science ecosystem as an emerging professional.
The world of data science extends far beyond the classroom. Professional identity, ethical awareness, technical growth, and community engagement are just as important as coding and modeling.
The Data Science Experience (DSE) assignment is designed to:
Expose you to real-world data science practice
Help you connect classroom learning to industry, research, ethics, and public impact
Build your professional communication and reflection skills
Create portfolio-ready artifacts
You will complete one Data Science Experiences this semester due at the end of term.
📌 Must be a unique experience (e.g., don’t copy over one from another of my courses…)
📌 No late submissions are accepted.
📌 You may submit anytime before the deadline.
Global Requirements
You must complete both parts for each DSE:
Acceptable Category Pairings
You must choose:
Two different categories among 1, 2, and 3, OR
Category 4 alone, OR
Category 5 alone
If uncertain, email your Professor before participating.
PART 1 — The Data Science Experience (Field Engagement)
Category 1: Attend a Talk, Conference, or Workshop
Attend a data science–related: * Talk * Panel * Workshop * Conference session * Hackathon onboarding or tutorial
Requirements
- Must be ≥ 30 minutes
- May be in-person or virtual (cannot be recordings)
- Must involve active data science, analytics, AI, or statistics content
Examples
- University data science seminars
- Posit::conf, PyData, SciPy talks
- Government or industry AI briefings
- Arizona Data Lab workshops
- Responsible AI / ethics panels
Category 2: Interview or Shadow a Data Scientist
Engage directly with someone who uses data science professionally, such as: * Industry professional * Research scientist * Graduate student * Faculty researcher * Government analyst
Minimum Expectations
- 30-minute conversation
- You must prepare at least 8 thoughtful questions
- Topics should include:
- Career path
- Daily workflow
- Tools used
- Ethical challenges
- Advice for students
You may conduct the interview:
In person
Via Zoom/Teams
Phone call
Category 3: Podcast, Documentary, or Long-Form Video
Watch or listen to a serious data science–focused program.
Requirements
- Must be ≥ 30 minutes
- Must be substantive and technical, ethical, or industry-focused
- Entertainment-only content does not qualify
Suggested Sources
- Data Science Imposters Podcast
- Data Skeptic Podcast
- FiveThirtyEight Model Talk
- posit::conf 2023 talks
- Arizona Data Lab workshops
This list is not exhaustive. You may listen to other podcasts or watch other data science videos not included on this list. Ask your professor if you are unsure whether a particular podcast or video will count towards the data science experience.
- For reference, here are some other podcasts.
Category 4: Participate in a real modeling challenge, individually or in a team.
Examples
Hackathons with modeling components
Category 5: Book Study in Data Science, Statistics, or Ethics
There are a lot of books about statistics, data science, and related topics. A few suggestions are below. If you decide to read a book that isn’t on this list, ask your professor to make sure it counts toward the experience. Many of these books are available through University of Arizona library.
- The Signal and the Noise: Why so many predictions fail - but some don’t by Nate Silver
- Weapons of Math Destruction by Cathy O’Neil
- How Charts Lie: Getting Smarter about Visual Information by Alberto Cairo
- The Art of Statistics: How to learn from data by David Spiegelhalter
- List of books about data science ethics
📌 You must read at least one full section, half, or the full book depending on length (defined per book).
PART 2 — Professional Artifact & Reflection
You will submit TWO deliverables for the Data Science Experience:
Deliverable A: Professional One-Slide Summary (PDF)
You must create one professional-quality slide using:
- Google Slides → Export PDF
- PowerPoint → Export PDF
- Quarto RevealJS → Export PDF
- OR a comparable professional tool
[!Note] Feel free to use this template or use
slide.qmd
Your slide MUST include:
Title & Experience Type
- Event name / Interviewee role / Podcast title / Competition name / Book title
Core Topic Summary
- What was this experience actually about?
Something New, Surprising, or Challenging
- A technical concept you didn’t know
- A career reality you didn’t expect
- A modeling limitation that surprised you
- An ethical tension that stood out
- A technical concept you didn’t know
Explicit Course Connection
You MUST reference at least one:- Statistical method
- Model type
- Visualization principle
- Data cleaning issue
- Evaluation metric
- Ethical framework
Example: > “This directly connects to our discussion of class imbalance and ROC/AUC trade-offs.”
- Statistical method
Credible Citation or Link
- Event webpage
- Podcast URL
- Book reference
- Competition URL
- Event webpage
Slides that are vague, overly generic, or purely descriptive will not receive full credit.
Deliverable B: Written Reflection (600–1,000 words)
Your reflection must be submitted as a Quarto file named:
reflection.qmd
Your reflection MUST address ALL of the following sections:
1. Context & Motivation
- Why did you choose this experience?
- What did you expect going in?
2. Technical & Conceptual Learning
- What did you actually learn about:
- Data?
- Models?
- Tools?
- Decision-making?
- What technical content connected most strongly to this course?
3. Professional Insight
- What did this reveal about:
- Industry practice?
- Research timelines?
- Career paths?
- Collaboration?
- Ethics?
4. Critical Reflection
- What limitations, biases, or tradeoffs were present?
- What was not addressed that should have been?
- What would you question, challenge, or investigate further?
5. Forward Connection
- How will this experience influence:
- Your future coursework?
- Your projects?
- Your career goals?
- Your understanding of data science as a discipline?
Summaries without analysis will not receive full credit.
PART 3 — Evidence & Verification
To ensure authenticity, you must include at least one form of verification evidence.
Acceptable Evidence by Experience Type:
| Experience Type | Acceptable Evidence |
|---|---|
| Talk / Workshop | Screenshot of registration, agenda, or attendance |
| Interview | Photo (if permitted), email confirmation, or signed acknowledgment |
| Podcast / Video | Screenshot of playback with visible timestamp |
| Competition | Screenshot of submission page or leaderboard |
| Book | Photo of book + page range OR reading log |
Save this as:
ds-experience/
├── slide.pdf
├── reflection.qmd
├── evidence.pdf (or /evidence folder)
Grading Rubric (100 Points)
| Category | Points |
|---|---|
| Quality of Experience Selection | 20 |
| Slide Content & Clarity | 20 |
| Technical & Course Connection | 20 |
| Written Reflection Depth | 25 |
| Evidence & Professionalism | 15 |
| Total | 100 |
Why This Assignment Matters
By the end of the semester, you will have:
- ✅ One real-world data science engagements
- ✅ One professional portfolio artifacts
- ✅ One deep reflections on your technical and ethical growth
- ✅ A clearer understanding of how data science actually works in practice
Creativity is encouraged. Professionalism is required.